ACCC Takes Meta to Court Over Deceptive Celebrity Crypto Ads Targeting Australians

Have you ever scrolled through your social media feed and seen an advertisement featuring a well-known celebrity endorsing a seemingly foolproof cryptocurrency investment? It might sound enticing, especially in the booming world of digital currencies. But hold on a second, because in Australia, the authorities are cracking down on what they say are deceptive practices by tech giants like Meta (formerly Facebook).

ACCC Sues Meta for Allegedly Hosting Fraudulent Celebrity Crypto Ads

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), the country’s watchdog for consumer rights, has officially filed a lawsuit against Meta Platforms Inc. and its Irish subsidiary. The core of the issue? The ACCC alleges that Meta engaged in “false, misleading or deceptive conduct” by allowing fraudulent cryptocurrency advertisements featuring prominent Australian figures to run on their platforms.

These aren’t just any ads; we’re talking about sophisticated and persistent scams that have reportedly swindled Australians out of hundreds of thousands of dollars since February. Imagine trusting a familiar face, only to find out it’s a cleverly crafted illusion leading you straight into a financial trap. This is the reality many Australians have faced, and the ACCC is stepping in to hold Meta accountable.

The ACCC’s investigation into Meta and these questionable crypto ads has been ongoing, especially after Australian mining magnate Andrew Forrest took legal action against the corporation. Forrest claimed that his image and name were used without permission in these deceptive advertisements to lure unsuspecting victims. The ACCC’s legal filing goes even further, stating that Meta “aided and abetted or was knowingly concerned in fraudulent or misleading conduct” by the individuals behind these scams.

According to the ACCC, these unapproved and misleading ads featured recognizable Australian personalities, including:

• Entrepreneur Dick Smith
• TV Host David Koch
• Former NSW Premier Mike Baird

These are trusted figures in the Australian community, making the scam all the more believable and damaging.

How Did These Celebrity Crypto Scams Operate on Facebook?

So, how exactly did these scams unfold on a platform as massive as Facebook? The ACCC explains that the fraudulent ads used a cunning strategy:

1. Enticing Celebrity Endorsements: The ads featured images and names of well-known Australians, creating an immediate sense of trust and credibility.
2. Suspicious Links: These ads contained links that would take users away from Facebook to external websites.
3. Bogus News Articles: The external links led to fake news articles designed to look legitimate. These articles contained fabricated quotes attributed to the featured celebrities, seemingly endorsing specific cryptocurrencies or “get-rich-quick” investment schemes.
4. High-Pressure Sales Tactics: Once users signed up through these fake articles, they were contacted by scammers who employed aggressive and persistent tactics, often through repeated phone calls.
5. Financial Loss: These scammers pressured victims into depositing funds into what were ultimately fake investment schemes, leading to significant financial losses for many Australians.

The regulator emphasizes that these weren’t just simple pop-up ads; they were sophisticated operations designed to exploit trust and deceive users.

Why is the ACCC Taking Action Now?

ACCC Chair Rod Sims minced no words when explaining why they are taking Meta to court. He stated unequivocally, “Meta is liable for these ads that it publishes on its platform.” The ACCC argues that Meta directly profits from these advertisements, regardless of their fraudulent nature. Every ad click, every user interaction contributes to Meta’s revenue, even if it’s based on deception.

The ACCC believes that Meta’s actions are in direct violation of:

• Australian Consumer Law (ACL): This law protects consumers from misleading and deceptive conduct in trade or commerce.
• Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act (ASIC Act): This act regulates financial products and services and prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in relation to financial products.

As a result of these alleged breaches, the ACCC is seeking serious repercussions, including:

• Declarations: Formal rulings from the court that Meta’s conduct was indeed unlawful.
• Injunctions: Court orders to prevent Meta from continuing similar conduct in the future.
• Penalties: Financial fines imposed on Meta for its alleged breaches of consumer law.
• Costs: Reimbursement of legal expenses incurred by the ACCC in pursuing the case.
• Other Orders: The court has broad powers to make additional orders as it sees fit to remedy the situation.

What Does This Mean for Australians and Social Media Users?

This legal action by the ACCC against Meta is a significant step in holding social media platforms accountable for the content they host, particularly when it comes to financial scams. It sends a clear message that platforms cannot simply turn a blind eye to fraudulent advertisements that harm their users, especially when they profit from them.

For Australians, this case highlights the critical need for vigilance when encountering online advertisements, especially those related to investments and cryptocurrencies. Always remember:

• Be Skeptical of Celebrity Endorsements: Just because a celebrity is featured doesn’t mean they genuinely endorse a product, especially in the crypto world. Always verify claims independently.
• Beware of “Too Good To Be True” Offers: If an investment opportunity promises guaranteed high returns with little to no risk, it’s likely a scam.
• Check Website Legitimacy: Carefully examine the website you are directed to. Look for poor grammar, spelling errors, and lack of contact information.
• Do Your Own Research: Before investing in anything, conduct thorough research from reputable sources and consult with a qualified financial advisor.
• Report Suspicious Ads: If you encounter a suspicious advertisement on social media, report it to the platform and to the ACCC.

The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how social media platforms are regulated in Australia and potentially globally, especially concerning their responsibility to protect users from fraudulent advertising.

In Conclusion: Protecting Australians from Online Scams

The ACCC’s lawsuit against Meta underscores the growing concern over online scams and the responsibilities of tech giants in preventing them. As the digital landscape evolves, so too do the tactics of scammers. This legal battle serves as a reminder that both platforms and individuals must remain vigilant and proactive in combating online fraud. For Australians, it’s a call to be informed, cautious, and to demand greater accountability from the platforms we use every day. The fight against online scams is far from over, but this case is a significant step in the right direction.

Related Posts – Bank DBS’s Crypto Business Grows Massively Due To Growing Demand From Investors