Blockchain News

CZ Warns: 99% Will Lose Crypto with Self-Custody – Are You in the Risky Percentage?

Only 1% of People can Handle Crypto Self-Custody Right Now: Binance CEO

Is keeping your cryptocurrency in your own hands truly the safest option? Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao has sparked a significant debate in the crypto world with a stark warning: 99% of people who attempt to self-custody their crypto will likely lose it. This comes at a time when billions in stablecoins are reportedly leaving Binance, prompting questions about user confidence and asset security. Let’s dive into CZ’s perspective, understand the nuances of self-custody, and explore whether it’s the right path for you.

CZ’s U-Turn on Self-Custody: A Cause for Concern?

For years, self-custody has been championed as the gold standard of crypto security – ‘be your own bank’ is a popular mantra in the decentralized world. Interestingly, CZ himself has been a vocal supporter of self-custody, even calling it a “basic human right.” Back in February 2020, he shared “CZ’s Tips” on securely managing your own cryptocurrency. So, what’s changed?

During a recent Binance-hosted Twitter Spaces discussion on December 14th, CZ voiced a more cautious stance. He emphasized that while self-custody is ideal in theory, the practical reality for most users is fraught with risks. He pointed out that security keys are often not stored securely, backed up adequately, or properly encrypted.

For most people, for 99% of people today, asking them to hold crypto on their own, they will end up losing it,” CZ stated, highlighting a potentially uncomfortable truth about the current state of crypto security for the average user.

Why Does CZ Believe Self-Custody is So Risky for Most?

CZ elaborated on the common pitfalls of self-custody, explaining why he believes it’s riskier for most individuals than using a centralized exchange like Binance. Here are the key reasons he highlighted:

  • Lost Security Keys: “The majority of individuals are unable to back up their security keys; they will lose the device.” Imagine losing your phone or having your computer crash without a proper backup of your private keys. Access to your crypto would be permanently lost.
  • Inadequate Encryption: “They will not have sufficient backup encryption; they will write it on a piece of paper, someone else will read it, and they will take those monies,” CZ warned. Simply writing down your seed phrase on a piece of paper and leaving it exposed is a major security vulnerability.
  • Lack of Inheritance Planning: Even if you manage your keys perfectly, what happens to your crypto if you’re no longer around? “Even when self-custody assets are correctly maintained, if a person goes away, they don’t have a method to distribute to their next of kin,” CZ pointed out. This highlights a significant challenge for long-term crypto holders.

In essence, CZ argues that the responsibility and technical expertise required for secure self-custody are beyond the capabilities of most people right now. He believes that, statistically, “more individuals lose money holding their own — lose more crypto when they’re holding on their own than on a centralized exchange.”

Self-Custody vs. Centralized Exchanges: Weighing the Risks

CZ’s comments force us to consider the risk profiles of different crypto custody solutions. Let’s compare self-custody wallets with centralized exchanges:

Feature Self-Custody Wallet Centralized Exchange (e.g., Binance)
Control of Private Keys You have full control Exchange controls keys
Security Responsibility Solely your responsibility Shared responsibility (exchange security measures)
Ease of Use Can be technically challenging for beginners Generally user-friendly interfaces
Recovery Options Limited to your backups; loss of keys = loss of funds Account recovery processes available (KYC dependent)
Inheritance Planning Complex, requires proactive planning Potentially simpler through exchange protocols (still evolving)
Risk of Exchange Failure Not applicable Risk of exchange hacks, insolvency, or regulatory issues

As CZ himself acknowledges, “various solutions have different risk profiles,” and the best choice depends entirely on individual circumstances, technical proficiency, and risk tolerance.

Is Centralization the Only Answer? CZ’s Vision for the Future

Despite heading a largely centralized exchange, CZ maintains a surprisingly neutral stance on custody. He reiterated that Binance is “neutral” on custody and self-custody solutions. In fact, he even stated in a previous Twitter Space on November 14th that he would happily shut down Binance if users transitioned en masse to decentralized alternatives, showing a commitment to the core principles of crypto.

CZ envisions a future where self-custody becomes safer and more accessible for everyone. “If we can find a mechanism to enable individuals to retain their own assets in their own custody safely and easily, then 99% of the general populace can do it,” he remarked. This suggests that while he sees significant challenges with current self-custody practices, he remains optimistic about future solutions that could empower individuals to truly own their digital assets.

What Should You Do? Actionable Insights on Crypto Custody

CZ’s warning isn’t meant to scare you away from crypto, but rather to encourage responsible and informed decision-making regarding custody. Here are some actionable insights to consider:

  • Assess Your Technical Skills: Are you comfortable managing private keys, seed phrases, and backups? Be honest with yourself about your technical abilities.
  • Start Small with Self-Custody: If you’re new to self-custody, begin with a small amount of crypto to learn the ropes and practice secure key management.
  • Educate Yourself: Thoroughly research best practices for self-custody. Understand different wallet types, security measures, and backup strategies.
  • Consider Hardware Wallets: For larger holdings, hardware wallets offer enhanced security by keeping your private keys offline.
  • Explore Multi-Sig Solutions: For added security, especially for larger amounts or shared accounts, consider multi-signature wallets that require multiple keys to authorize transactions.
  • Don’t Neglect Centralized Exchanges (Responsibly): Centralized exchanges can be convenient for trading and holding smaller amounts of crypto you actively use. Choose reputable exchanges with strong security measures.
  • Plan for Inheritance: Regardless of your custody solution, think about how your crypto assets will be managed and passed on in the future.

Conclusion: Your Crypto, Your Choice, Your Responsibility

Changpeng Zhao’s perspective on self-custody serves as a crucial reality check. While the ideal of full ownership and control over your assets is appealing, it comes with significant responsibility and risk. CZ’s remarks highlight that self-custody is not a one-size-fits-all solution and, in its current form, may not be suitable for the vast majority of crypto users.

Ultimately, the choice between self-custody and centralized solutions is a personal one. “It is up to the user to pick what is best for them,” as CZ rightly states. The key takeaway is to be informed, understand the risks and benefits of each approach, and choose the custody solution that aligns with your technical skills, security needs, and comfort level. As the crypto space evolves, so too will custody solutions, hopefully making secure self-custody more accessible and user-friendly for everyone in the future.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice, Bitcoinworld.co.in holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.