SBF ‘Unilaterally Controlled’ Alameda Finances, Claims Former FTX Engineering Director Nishad Singh in Explosive Testimony

The FTX saga continues to unfold, and the latest courtroom revelations are nothing short of explosive. Nishad Singh, FTX’s former director of engineering, has delivered damning testimony against Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), alleging that SBF was the puppet master behind Alameda Research’s finances, effectively sidelining even its CEO, Caroline Ellison. Let’s dive into the details of Singh’s testimony and what it means for the ongoing trial and the broader crypto world.

Singh’s Testimony: SBF’s Shadow Over Alameda

During his appearance on October 16th in a New York courtroom, Singh painted a picture of Sam Bankman-Fried as the ultimate authority at Alameda Research, despite Caroline Ellison and Sam Trabucco officially being at the helm. According to Singh, SBF’s control was absolute and often unilateral. Here’s a breakdown of the key points from Singh’s testimony:

• Unilateral Decisions: Singh testified that SBF routinely made financial decisions for Alameda independently, without consulting or necessarily informing Ellison or Trabucco.
• Override Authority: Despite Ellison’s CEO title, Singh indicated that SBF’s authority superseded hers. He even mentioned that SBF threatened to fire Ellison, highlighting the power dynamic.
• Excessive Spending Concerns: Singh expressed concerns about Alameda’s extravagant spending, which he felt deviated from FTX’s core mission. He recounted complaining to SBF about this “excess and flamboyance.”
• Dismissal of Concerns: When Singh raised concerns about Alameda’s spending, SBF allegedly dismissed them, claiming Singh didn’t understand the bigger picture and accused him of “sowing doubt.”

This testimony directly challenges the narrative that Alameda was an independent entity managed by Caroline Ellison. It suggests a much deeper level of control and potential manipulation by SBF.

The Billion-Dollar Investments: Anthropic and K5 Global

Singh’s testimony also shed light on specific instances of Alameda’s questionable spending, particularly highlighting two significant investments:

• Anthropic: An artificial intelligence startup that received a substantial investment from Alameda.
• K5 Global: An investment firm with ties to high-profile figures like Hillary Clinton and Hollywood celebrities.

According to Singh, SBF instructed him and former CTO Gary Wang to proceed with a staggering $1 billion investment in K5 Global, co-owned by Michael Kives and Bryan Baum. This is where things get even more interesting.

Questioning the Source of Funds

In a particularly revealing part of his testimony, Singh stated, “I requested that it be funded using Sam’s resources rather than FTX’s funds.” This statement raises critical questions:

• Awareness of Fund Source: Did Singh suspect or know that Alameda was using FTX customer funds? His request suggests he was at least concerned about the source of these massive investments.
• SBF’s Personal Resources vs. FTX Funds: The distinction Singh makes between “Sam’s resources” and “FTX’s funds” is crucial. It hints at a potential commingling of funds and a blurring of lines between SBF’s personal wealth and FTX’s customer deposits.

This point could be pivotal in proving whether SBF knowingly misused customer funds for Alameda’s ventures.

Who is Nishad Singh and Why Does His Testimony Matter?

Nishad Singh was a key insider at FTX, serving as the Director of Engineering. His close proximity to both FTX and Alameda operations makes his testimony highly credible and impactful. Along with Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang, Singh has already pleaded guilty to fraud charges related to the misuse of FTX funds. His cooperation with prosecutors is likely part of a plea deal, but it also provides a firsthand account of the inner workings of FTX and Alameda under SBF’s leadership.

Nishad Singh’s testimony is crucial in understanding the inner workings of FTX and Alameda Research.

The Trial Timeline and What’s Next

Singh’s testimony came on the ninth day of SBF’s criminal trial, which began on October 3rd in New York and is expected to stretch into November. Here’s a quick recap of the trial context:

• Ongoing Trial: The trial is expected to continue into November, with more witnesses and evidence to be presented.
• Possible Second Trial: SBF is also likely to face further charges in another court in March 2024, indicating the legal battles are far from over.
• Not Guilty Plea: SBF has pleaded not guilty to all 12 counts in his indictment, setting the stage for a protracted legal fight.
• Key Witnesses: Ellison, Wang, and Singh have all admitted to illicit activities, and their testimonies are central to the prosecution’s case. The possibility of Ryan Salame testifying remains uncertain, and SBF’s defense strategy, including whether he will testify himself, is still unclear.

User Testimony: Tareq Morad’s Perspective

Adding another layer to the prosecution’s case, FTX user Tareq Morad also testified on October 16th. Morad shared his understanding of how FTX would use his deposits and how his trust in SBF influenced his investment decisions. His testimony highlighted:

• Trust in SBF: Morad trusted SBF’s public persona and assurances, which played a role in his decision to invest with FTX.
• SBF’s Tweets: Even amidst withdrawal issues at FTX in November 2022, Morad relied on SBF’s tweets assuring the safety of assets, demonstrating the power of SBF’s public image in maintaining user confidence.

Morad’s testimony underscores the human impact of the FTX collapse, showcasing how user trust was placed in SBF and ultimately betrayed.

The Big Picture: Illicit Activities Acknowledged

The prosecution’s case is building momentum as key insiders like Ellison, Wang, and Singh have all admitted to participating in illicit activities alongside Bankman-Fried.

Key Admissions:

Witness	Admission
Caroline Ellison	Admitted to providing fraudulent documents and making deceptive statements about Alameda’s use of FTX funds.
Gary Wang	Asserted that those in charge at FTX allowed Alameda unlimited withdrawals of funds.
Nishad Singh	Testified to SBF’s unilateral control over Alameda’s finances and questionable investment practices using potentially FTX funds.

These admissions, combined with user testimonies, paint a compelling picture of a company where customer funds were allegedly misused and where a select few at the top operated with impunity.

Conclusion: The Walls Closing in on SBF?

Nishad Singh’s testimony is a significant blow to Sam Bankman-Fried’s defense. It reinforces the narrative of SBF as the central figure controlling both FTX and Alameda, and potentially orchestrating the misuse of customer funds. As the trial progresses, the cumulative weight of insider testimonies and user accounts is mounting, suggesting that the legal challenges for SBF are becoming increasingly formidable. The crypto world watches with bated breath as the FTX saga continues to unfold, with each revelation adding another layer to this complex and high-stakes drama.